CNN: It’s Not Wrong to Eat Dogs

DISCLAIMER: The IE does not endorse opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in Editorial articles. The IE welcomes all opinions and comments, but reserves the right to decline publishing articles that contain vulgar or abusive language, personal attacks of any kind, or offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups.

Nick Wong

In China, people eat dogs. Yes, unfortunately, the stereotype of the Chinese eating, well…everything, is somewhat true even in the context of what we consider a household pet. Earlier this month, CNN published a video covering the dog meat market in Guangzhou, China. I cringed at the thought of my own family’s black lab and Chesapeake mix being served on someone’s dinner plate. However, in reading many CNN viewer comments referring to Chinese society as “barbaric,” “backwards,” and “uncivilized,” I realized that my personal opinion, too, was based on a cultural perspective. After thinking about it objectively, I don’t see anything wrong with eating dog meat. Now before readers start claiming animal cruelty or labeling me as an inhumane animal hater, hear me out.

First, China is not the only country to incorporate dog meat in their gastronomy, nor is eating dog distinct to Asian culture. In the times of the Aztecs and other tribal societies in the Americas, dog-eating was common, culturally accepted and exemplifies a historical precedence of the practice. The people of Switzerland have cured dog meat into jerkies and sausages, while in both Switzerland and Poland, dog lard has been reportedly used for medicinal purposes. Also, in times of severe depression or war, dogs were commonly eaten out of necessity in every part of the world.

But regardless if these customs are practiced in Asia, the Americas, Europe, or in times of need, it is the thought of consuming dog meat that troubles most Westerners. While I am unaccustomed to eating canines just as much as the next person in this country, I also began questioning from where that discomfort manifests.

Much of it largely resides in the level of adoration we place on domesticated animals. In a society that can sometimes treat animals more humanely than people, where there is a growing service industry of dog hotels and pet psychiatrics, it’s no surprise the thought of eating dogs generates almost a comparable level of shock and disgust to cannibalism. But this reaction is largely due to the association of dogs as our companions, not because there is anything inherently wrong with the practice. If that was, in fact, the case, why don’t we question all meats we consume?

In India, beef sales are banned throughout nearly the entire country due to the sacred reverence of the cow in Indian society. Therefore from an Indian perspective, the US American beef-heavy diet could be considered barbaric, perhaps even sacrilegious. Yet according to the US Department of Agriculture, we plow through 27.3 billion pounds of beef a year. What gives us the right to disregard the beliefs of another culture, yet disallow another nation from having that same right? Clearly then, it isn’t necessarily that using dogs as meat is innately offensive, but rather, just offensive to us.

If it’s an issue of humane treatment towards animals raised for consumption, the overcrowded and caged settings of the dogs shown in the news clip are just as, if not less, inhumane as America’s own slaughterhouses for cattle, chicken and pigs. So maybe it’s not so much that dog eating should be considered barbaric or uncivilized, but rather the way in which we treat animals that are raised for the purposes of consumption. If that were the case, the American meat industry could take a lesson or two in humane animal treatment as well.

Of course people still hold the right to enjoy the company of domesticated animals like dogs, but we should do it in a manner without imposing our beliefs onto the rest of the world or denigrating another society just because it doesn’t live in accordance to our norms. Allegedly, none of the dogs featured in the news bit were household pets, so beyond our own cultural dispositions towards this particular animal, what’s the problem?

See CNN’s coverage at www.cnn.com.

  • branbran77

    Man i agree…….iv been saying for a long time we should cook up all the dogs and cats that are in the pounds and shelters and feed the hungery in the US…..just seems like a huge wast of meat to me.

  • Kasia

    Please make sure you back up your sources before you write an article! I grew up in rural Polish culture and I have never heard of anyone using dog lard for medicinal purposes. Dogs are very much loved as pets in our culture. You are basing this off of one article that appeared in a British Journal who based their sources on an animal rights fanatic who claimed that dog lard has been traditionally used in Polish medicine. This person was overreacting to an incident where some local farmer was joking that he was using stray dogs for lard. It was a joke that got out of hand.

    Any Polish person, be it a backwoods farmer or the most educated and urbane would find dog meat abhorrent.

    Sorry, no matter how much you say that eating dog meat in Asia is apart of their culture. Yes, I do judge them still. Eating dog is different from eating chicken. Since the earliest establishment of human culture, dogs were used as working animals, companion animals. They were domesticated for the usage of herding, hunting and protecting. Not as livestock or food!!!! The consumption of dog meat in Asia is relatively new to their culture considering how old their culture is. There is no reason for it other than there is something grossly wrong with the modern Asian society. There were also rural parts of China that ate other people who disagreed with the government. This happened in the 1960s! Are you going to tell me that eating an anti-Communist is no different than eating chicken? Please.

    Scientists have done studies on dogs. What makes a dog so inherently different from other animals is that from the moment a puppy opens its eyes it can recognize all the human expressions and knows what it means. Chickens and cows are incapable of doing this! Chickens are stupid. You cannot use them as pets. Cows are so dumb and big, how can they ever be used as a pet.

    I do believe that some animals are meant to be eaten and some are not. Yes I will judge a crazy practice. You can tell me its apart of their “Ancient” culture all you want, but the fact of the matter is, it is something very “new” to their culture. And stupid.

    • raja

      @Kasia,
      Ominovores or carnivores eat other omnivores or carnivores. There is nothing stupid about it. You can make moral or societal arguments against eating this or that; people eat what they get and sometime what they want. Eating dogs is not new to anybody…it has been done all over the world…but now we can afford to keep them as pets (nothing wrong with that).
      As humans, we are blessed with some extra awareness that we can choose to protect planet’s wonderful creations (that includes “stupid” cows and chicken as well), sometimes we choose to put some of those animals on endangered list..and not eat them..other than that..I guess everything is fair game..
      I grew up in rural India and I know how affectionate a Cow can be. Maybe it can’t fetch frisbees for you but a young calf can certainly cuddle up to you. I have seen kids have Chicken or a Goat as a pet too…and kids do cry when sometimes they are served up for dinner…

    • Evie

      I have pet chickens and they are very affectionate. They are called Silkies, and are bred to be sweet and follow you around, like kittens.